Efficiency gains through bureaucracy reduction: Less control, more revenue

Bureaucracy isn't only created by the government. Often, it's the companies themselves that burden their teams with excessive documentation requirements. Reducing this burden generates more revenue and retains employees, a recent study shows.

This article is part of the special topic Bureaucratic madness in the craft industry

In a chain of artisan bakeries with over 1.350 employees, until a few months ago, the sales staff had to document daily how often they Smile at customers, maintain eye contact, say goodbye and clean the counterIn addition, the sales staff carry out the usual bakery Daily log for documenting information such as cash balances, out-of-stock items, orders, IT problems, or special incidents. It is used for communication between shifts.

That's not enough for the company. There are many more checklists and documentation requirements for employees. For example, they must record how crispy the rolls are when they come out of the oven. Each employee, according to their own statements, invests an average of more than five hours for documentationAnd not, as is usual in the bakery trade, 12,5 hours per business - which is already above average, because in the industry there are already numerous documentation and information obligations (Risk assessment, food law, receipt issuing, working hours, etc.) and structural requirements.  

What happens if documentation requirements are no longer required?

A team of scientists at the bakery chain analyzed what would happen if documentation requirements were eliminated. The study by the team led by Matthias Heinz, Spokesperson of the Cluster of Excellence ECONtribute at the University of Cologne, together with researchers from the universities of Frankfurt, Konstanz, Munich, and Santa Barbara, came to the conclusion: "Those who control employees too tightly harm the company." 

During the study, the bakery eliminated two checklists for employees in half of its 145 branches that were perceived as particularly time-consuming and unhelpful: the one on which employees had to record their behavior ("operational list"), and the daily log. With measurable success.

Compared to stores with full documentation requirements, sales in stores without checklists increased by an average of 2,7 percent. However, the effect varied by location: In stores where regional managers predicted that teams would cope well without a checklist, sales increased by an average of more than five percent. In stores where managers were skeptical, there was no effect.

The quality remained high despite the elimination of lists

Anonymous mystery shoppers rated the shopping experience similarly highly. In stores where the checklists were abolished, the turnover of trained employees (often managers) fell by an average of 35 percent compared to the other stores. According to the study, higher-qualified employees, in particular, were less bothered by the documentation requirements. harassed, monitored and not taken seriously Unskilled workers would have found the control more helpful.

According to team surveys, the decisive factor for the positive effects was not the time savings, but the tangible appreciationEmployees felt taken seriously, were more motivated, and more committed to the company. Matthias Heinz: "Reducing bureaucracy can help companies retain good staff in times of skilled labor shortages."  

After completing the experiment, the bakery chain decided on a compromise: It retained the daily protocol and permanently abolished the other list of customer behavior, the operational list. 

Conclusion of the study: Many checklists can be harmful

Find the balance

Companies and institutions must find the right balance between necessary oversight and trust in their employees. Documentation requirements should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and the costs and benefits should be weighed: Are they really worth it to achieve the desired result (e.g., increased revenue, lower turnover, higher customer satisfaction)? 

Differentiation instead of blanket solutions

The key is where and for whom you reduce bureaucracy. Checklists aren't bad per se, but they don't make sense for all teams and work steps. Bureaucratic routines should be regularly evaluated.

More trust

Executive boards should give middle management more trust and more freedom to make decisions. They usually know their teams best and can assess in practice which measures will be effective.

Questioning routines

Instead of introducing new measures to increase productivity, it can be more cost-effective and profitable to question routines and abolish old structures.   

Source: ECONtribute 

DHB now also digital!Simply click here and register for the digital German Crafts Journal (DHB)!